{"id":"W3124614449","doi":"","title":"Identifying Paralogisms in Two Ethnically Different Contexts at University Level","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Task (project management); Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Variation (astronomy); Ambivalence; Ethnically diverse; Argumentation theory; Social psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Ethnic group; Medicine; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004648268,0.0003214044,0.0004783465,0.001293743,0.002538188,0.002723947,0.0005947126,0.000725135,0.001851661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01237584,0.0002407647,0.0002246056,0.00111138,0.002173504,0.001490316,0.002924647,0.001085713,0.0003136577],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001034481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008706644,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00365095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01103155,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971833,0.001744691,0.0001741598,0.0002714808,0.0003197773,0.00030656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913827,0.004559963,0.001571987,0.0006353601,0.001008213,0.0008418662],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006392802,0.0012595,0.2976299,0.0001249635,0.00004269653,0.002033867,0.6584305,0.000156967,0.008425698,0.002955117,0.0003450405,0.02795642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003501494,0.0004151603,0.395067,0.00008868429,0.00003189381,0.000988094,0.5930929,0.0004317964,0.00411,0.001719811,0.003972902,0.00004679292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992254,0.00003152251,0.00003531775,0.00002385872,0.000001826079,0.000002064098,0.000001794023,4.510553e-7,0.0006777687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993788,0.00004671636,0.0001278398,0.00002504437,0.000002328356,0.000004613475,0.000008885923,0.000001917041,0.0004037674],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004648268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02458268,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0394948098171892,"score_gpt":0.3198563431901355,"score_spread":0.2803615333729462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}