{"id":"W3124705337","doi":"10.1016/j.joep.2009.08.006","title":"Cognitive coherence and tort reform","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Psychology","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Punitive damages; Tort reform; Tort; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Social psychology; Settlement (finance); Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Cognition; Joint and several liability; Economics; Political science; Law; Liability; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003819553,0.000174562,0.0002977023,0.001246456,0.001658181,0.005150964,0.0005074109,0.002263187,0.006613663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03046685,0.0002264372,0.0002421596,0.001064855,0.006388687,0.005438963,0.001849885,0.002464184,0.0002415078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001752837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001491796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003055269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003323522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976614,0.001202244,0.000106163,0.0002940099,0.0004715987,0.0002645762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781092,0.01378929,0.004102899,0.001311252,0.001678108,0.001009257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001380563,0.0003866345,0.01645328,0.00005914193,0.00006473393,0.0001811339,0.01070708,0.001914765,0.0007211334,0.944355,0.002738279,0.02228074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006729166,0.0000468719,0.02371371,0.00002490635,0.00003640579,0.00009619186,0.003589315,0.002911077,0.0001792826,0.9643281,0.004986125,0.00002075751],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7867965,0.001589884,0.01185234,0.03463252,0.0000886006,0.00004488112,0.00009746762,0.00002565496,0.1648722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984865,0.0001213321,0.0004014245,0.0003019003,0.00003869251,0.000005702128,0.00001603747,0.000003540164,0.0006249339],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006613663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02212495,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04692673649824965,"score_gpt":0.2916248924869158,"score_spread":0.2446981559886661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}