{"id":"W3124705337","doi":"10.1016/j.joep.2009.08.006","title":"Cognitive coherence and tort reform","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Psychology","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Punitive damages; Tort reform; Tort; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Social psychology; Settlement (finance); Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Cognition; Joint and several liability; Economics; Political science; Law; Liability; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008604027,0.0001296849,0.0007233114,0.0002396956,0.00006153393,0.0000513174,0.0002372625,0.0001589128,0.0003537551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004403228,0.0001650088,0.0001408298,0.00003925167,0.0001501973,0.0003795378,0.00001948667,0.0002028661,0.0003840974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002351193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003447291,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008720995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003646739,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981005,0.00001753177,0.001307659,0.0002929526,0.00001395376,0.0002673939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982556,0.00004606401,0.00133089,0.0001769993,0.00003364127,0.0001568742],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006572088,0.00035819,0.1465556,0.00002334816,0.0005212925,0.00007202751,0.001274138,0.000019817,0.0001288296,0.8096045,0.01498438,0.02580069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004256719,0.001766595,0.2686843,0.00006802696,0.00002661273,0.0009108174,0.0003510559,0.0001133077,0.00006303847,0.6769948,0.04619117,0.0005735694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7099355,0.00235955,0.0004520256,0.001912654,0.002231403,0.000123264,0.00004258681,0.00001009671,0.2829328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960101,0.0008602424,0.000159565,0.001951034,0.0007783466,0.000001965559,0.000001816938,0.00001308167,0.0002238197],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2860745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6728863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04692673649824965,"score_gpt":0.2916248924869158,"score_spread":0.2446981559886661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}