{"id":"W3124890228","doi":"","title":"Optimal Intraday Power Trading with a Gaussian Additive Process","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Maturity (psychological); Portfolio; Econometrics; Order (exchange); Trading strategy; Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process; Gaussian; Economics; Frame (networking); Financial market; Process (computing); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Mathematics; Financial economics; Stochastic process; Finance; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003579032,0.000945597,0.001721016,0.000537293,0.0003505067,0.001826416,0.001207095,0.001580156,0.001749724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009899298,0.0007658001,0.0009915824,0.0006627031,0.00175034,0.0019172,0.001424723,0.001378834,0.0001820065],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009888866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001015958,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006468743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004645458,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989908,0.0004824756,0.00005087855,0.0002100295,0.0001534641,0.0001122501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957793,0.003284924,0.0003839424,0.0001300895,0.0002488376,0.0001729924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001328805,0.00005465291,0.00124892,0.00005779824,0.00005724332,0.0001707645,0.00008118337,0.9211311,0.001054174,0.06797258,0.0003913188,0.007647473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009569345,0.00001555695,0.0001309019,0.000002642557,0.000007000568,0.000005663262,0.000005980193,0.9934868,0.000100359,0.006170081,0.00005831935,0.000007041372],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1488961,0.000454858,0.8456777,0.0007625818,0.00005890222,0.00004006174,0.0001223435,0.0001422124,0.003845169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9664612,0.000314024,0.02778764,0.00007259475,0.00005726234,0.000050431,0.00009679627,0.00003598042,0.005124016],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006468743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01892799,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009947472594244257,"score_gpt":0.2238732792304295,"score_spread":0.2139258066361852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}