{"id":"W3124903963","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1606.02783","title":"A non-equilibrium formulation of food security resilience","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Food security; Resilience (materials science); Per capita; Welfare; Economics; Psychological resilience; Partial equilibrium; Public economics; Unit (ring theory); General equilibrium theory; Natural resource economics; Development economics; Macroeconomics; Agriculture; Population; Geography; Mathematics; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001370031,0.0008203362,0.0007257987,0.001002948,0.0007766096,0.001691399,0.001654976,0.001608798,0.01130613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003380582,0.0003426162,0.00113609,0.0008889727,0.002112563,0.003477011,0.001933117,0.001582845,0.0006993182],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002187553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001261033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007628588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003485027,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992474,0.0002602034,0.00004132112,0.0002001685,0.0001193832,0.000131583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990551,0.0003562935,0.0002462861,0.00008100506,0.0001549709,0.0001064085],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001115287,0.00002903679,0.001045455,0.00005492565,0.00004175807,0.0001072098,0.000156228,0.09949064,0.0004784864,0.8924266,0.0024061,0.003752398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001861921,0.00004564756,0.001470708,0.00003421046,0.00001812826,0.00008138148,0.0002333202,0.3100869,0.0001364453,0.6802941,0.007547185,0.00003334329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08546685,0.0008560365,0.8146386,0.008608113,0.0004495003,0.0001721454,0.001822641,0.0002432952,0.08774288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9263942,0.001018118,0.04645155,0.0007970247,0.0002576153,0.0004180129,0.0005412555,0.00008332534,0.02403885],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01130613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03782278,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1230507444597418,"score_gpt":0.4520834047058225,"score_spread":0.3290326602460807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}