{"id":"W3124954583","doi":"10.1111/iere.12042","title":"NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF NONOPTIMAL DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM MODELS","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Victoria Park","funders":"","keywords":"Operator (biology); Incomplete markets; Set (abstract data type); Fixed point; Mathematical economics; Dynamic equilibrium; Computer science; Equilibrium point; Mathematical optimization; Markov process; Markov perfect equilibrium; Applied mathematics; Mathematics; Economics; Nash equilibrium; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001229733,0.000360792,0.0007075789,0.0005068772,0.0004465111,0.000787529,0.0008968205,0.0009810238,0.002377453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00730293,0.0002836042,0.0003549957,0.0004820454,0.0009357562,0.0009526164,0.001022205,0.0008317101,0.0001739593],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008900822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008974372,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006667071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004831223,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995061,0.0002560424,0.000026187,0.00005323793,0.0001061996,0.0000522386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968695,0.002240776,0.0002487105,0.0002234557,0.0003206791,0.00009690485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002250031,0.00001612299,0.0003113784,0.0000130835,0.00000618944,0.00002446871,0.00003628035,0.9795725,0.0002832057,0.01768704,0.0001054041,0.001921864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003790316,0.000003056577,0.00001701938,0.000001338732,7.043669e-7,0.000002029563,0.000004280201,0.9971228,0.0000900103,0.002655703,0.00009788731,0.000001270384],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2313273,0.000213283,0.7583366,0.0004670272,0.0000611204,0.00007762251,0.0001460546,0.0003819742,0.008988977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9006478,0.00008941007,0.09742643,0.00004281906,0.000007754052,0.0001353875,0.0001119328,0.00004732944,0.001491214],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006667071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01325655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0334949674294813,"score_gpt":0.2751146302773668,"score_spread":0.2416196628478855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}