{"id":"W3124999196","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2001.10092","title":"Objective Social Choice: Using Auxiliary Information to Improve Voting\\n Outcomes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Forecasting Techniques and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Computer science; Independent and identically distributed random variables; Majority rule; Inference; Artificial intelligence; Noise (video); Set (abstract data type); Core (optical fiber); Social choice theory; Artificial neural network; Normative; Machine learning; Data mining; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Random variable; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01404545,0.001214579,0.002345935,0.001918634,0.001234874,0.002839516,0.003299217,0.001972564,0.004720232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04147825,0.0006036435,0.001171749,0.001618168,0.002608478,0.005999189,0.003924404,0.002843874,0.0008634655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001792801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001892953,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001972308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003579447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913408,0.004806094,0.0004662544,0.001429928,0.00148781,0.0004691181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798936,0.01260914,0.002271445,0.002820887,0.001618625,0.0007863043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001397882,0.0005712391,0.01365751,0.0003719609,0.0004821936,0.0002167596,0.00123514,0.3381706,0.003117657,0.2799532,0.00540186,0.3554241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000878616,0.0001832014,0.001590722,0.00006290753,0.00006602109,0.00004165923,0.0001043451,0.8297202,0.001770805,0.1640647,0.002264902,0.00004265281],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1073546,0.0004287106,0.8797172,0.001703655,0.0001275382,0.0001992327,0.0002138541,0.0005268133,0.0097284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8523777,0.0001707165,0.142235,0.0003767018,0.0001218801,0.0002108068,0.000356936,0.000149264,0.004001122],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01404545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07428032,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2684356000253579,"score_gpt":0.3182760580553586,"score_spread":0.04984045803000065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}