{"id":"W3125045500","doi":"10.1142/s0219024913500374","title":"RESILIENT PRICE IMPACT OF TRADING AND THE COST OF ILLIQUIDITY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Market liquidity; Arbitrage; Economics; Econometrics; Asset (computer security); Liquidity risk; Order (exchange); Capital asset pricing model; Limiting; Resilience (materials science); Maximization; Psychological resilience; Financial economics; Microeconomics; Monetary economics; Computer science; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009079752,0.0008712535,0.000864425,0.0009617561,0.0004366011,0.00273481,0.001797353,0.002048467,0.004398997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006053326,0.000580426,0.000942255,0.0007787198,0.001851941,0.005419001,0.001739729,0.002320823,0.0003392175],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001425956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008187785,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002256256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001486794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999516,0.0001281667,0.0000242642,0.00009241894,0.000122568,0.0001165034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975874,0.0009722248,0.0008131276,0.0002141891,0.0001385499,0.000274407],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006496812,0.00007710065,0.001834899,0.00006780549,0.00003858532,0.0005863279,0.0001163439,0.53746,0.002667384,0.4504734,0.0008376738,0.005775516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000216677,0.00005598734,0.0008559439,0.00002230544,0.00003589325,0.000192348,0.00002949841,0.7391472,0.0004306562,0.2583745,0.0007976,0.00003641807],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4197305,0.001402657,0.5422255,0.004114991,0.0001021024,0.0001061283,0.000632633,0.0002836293,0.03140179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866266,0.0003967869,0.006446442,0.00008552409,0.00005670421,0.0000373077,0.00005659141,0.00002275966,0.006271397],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004398997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01471615,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01194427505001136,"score_gpt":0.2284201656035466,"score_spread":0.2164758905535352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}