{"id":"W3125087062","doi":"","title":"Evaluating Value-at-Risk models via Quantile Regression","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Universidad Carlos III de Madrid; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Leverhulme Trust; Banco Santander","keywords":"Quantile; Quantile regression; Econometrics; Monte Carlo method; Sample (material); Computer science; Value at risk; Value (mathematics); Regression analysis; Regression; Statistics; Mathematics; Economics; Risk management; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02343195,0.0008375932,0.002422206,0.002331794,0.001360059,0.0009226831,0.002568659,0.0008071547,0.0001925943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007450125,0.0008530177,0.000490769,0.0009707319,0.007632602,0.00178605,0.004273289,0.002458498,0.0000804114],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002498879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004380697,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01556879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004713666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.987548,0.0002495799,0.003798198,0.003209078,0.0004830134,0.004712142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891745,0.001155353,0.001518887,0.001824511,0.001015393,0.005311398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000173409,0.0002891201,0.01464639,0.0001610751,0.00003247905,0.000001794998,0.00007894512,0.006824938,0.000200164,0.975396,0.00002981855,0.002165871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006821348,0.00046885,0.01964677,0.000163056,0.00002339764,0.000009480876,0.0001020425,0.4427714,0.0005923638,0.5347094,0.0002854743,0.0005456383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826703,0.002713308,0.0004694681,0.003182706,0.0005423487,0.001012994,0.001939524,0.00002785132,0.007441471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764865,0.01183606,0.01050595,0.0003256225,0.0005448817,0.00002974155,0.00004714456,0.00006067286,0.0001634438],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4406866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1456903842925636,"score_gpt":0.4029815223341993,"score_spread":0.2572911380416357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}