{"id":"W3125103434","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2969133","title":"How Do Peers Impact Learning? An Experimental Investigation of Peer-to-Peer Teaching and Ability Tracking","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Innovations in Educational Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Tracking (education); Peer effects; Mathematics education; Peer feedback; Psychology; Curriculum; Peer-to-peer; Teaching method; Computer science; Pedagogy; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03064124,0.0002473217,0.0003377563,0.0003344172,0.002141007,0.001016902,0.0007239113,0.0003044184,0.00001905196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01084383,0.0002477204,0.0001430435,0.0001347664,0.0004450866,0.0007862177,0.0001565189,0.006239563,7.974654e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003575817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008830884,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002027725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005460641,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947246,0.001906418,0.0004046563,0.0004268548,0.001296015,0.001241495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970453,0.0002380129,0.0009086591,0.0003548655,0.001243957,0.0002092079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001248551,0.0003398658,0.1838129,0.00006126235,0.0004914491,0.000001536604,0.2650135,0.001547156,0.0157867,0.3554572,0.000372222,0.1769914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004140518,0.0006135157,0.04382167,0.0001973341,0.0000888323,0.00006307911,0.1972136,0.0001481332,0.001265642,0.751999,0.003459344,0.0007158494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832787,0.0004863056,0.002803214,0.010754,0.001016405,0.0003291288,0.00000618474,0.00003134546,0.001294709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857813,0.0000648489,0.01090858,0.00002883358,0.001410331,0.00001697046,0.00002214277,0.00003001361,0.001736961],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3965417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05117144026547915,"score_gpt":0.4396117391032761,"score_spread":0.3884402988377969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}