{"id":"W3125208295","doi":"","title":"Using Institutional Multiplicity to Address Corruption as a Collective Action Problem: Lessons from the Brazilian Case","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Collective action; Framing (construction); Status quo; Accountability; Political science; Language change; Politics; Political economy; Law and economics; Positive economics; Economics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009505742,0.0004632609,0.0007177055,0.001512861,0.00866707,0.005364527,0.001450401,0.003280424,0.002540253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01583863,0.0002535479,0.0007418671,0.001844893,0.01330476,0.006196671,0.006391054,0.003597364,0.0001514661],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01034244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006280375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04974284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0591419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922798,0.00538059,0.0002342224,0.0003532105,0.0007006678,0.001051574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896991,0.006325597,0.001326471,0.0009377562,0.0008926815,0.0008184358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002653442,0.0001133291,0.008904842,0.000109787,0.0000196057,0.003639183,0.0316287,0.002495214,0.0002197738,0.9420542,0.001313348,0.009475643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001898457,0.0002303231,0.02118773,0.001743139,0.0001697726,0.003897114,0.1693815,0.02881765,0.0008715512,0.6409264,0.1324556,0.0001293802],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6585985,0.004521323,0.02418104,0.05027104,0.0001522633,0.0002694293,0.00004828897,0.000039439,0.2619187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956797,0.0005763131,0.001376167,0.0004871911,0.00002302011,0.00003756593,0.000007184353,0.000006326217,0.001806533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04974284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09890664,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08131726834260503,"score_gpt":0.3675388573393602,"score_spread":0.2862215889967552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}