{"id":"W3125260050","doi":"10.1515/ijld-2017-0002","title":"Arguments of statutory interpretation and argumentation schemes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Discourse","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Defeasible estate; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory interpretation; Defeasible reasoning; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Statutory law; Inference; Computer science; Mathematics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01537365,0.0007897873,0.0007039097,0.003917653,0.002531567,0.006673614,0.002141506,0.00522742,0.007442537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03908642,0.0006414925,0.001525568,0.002711873,0.01000245,0.01309108,0.00383872,0.003273788,0.0007236121],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004731112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001362374,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001113818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008689305,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9816061,0.0127269,0.001091519,0.001017961,0.00298216,0.0005754393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9709257,0.0202692,0.002178228,0.002883846,0.003087507,0.0006556545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009930457,0.000003956819,0.00004628198,0.00001879914,0.000003650533,0.00002777559,0.0003440391,0.001105289,0.00008484817,0.9968161,0.000186491,0.001352936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002059482,0.000009041421,0.00005891593,0.00006805879,0.000007369406,0.0000413321,0.0001776689,0.01542521,0.0002909687,0.9759681,0.007923114,0.000009582322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07047251,0.001107114,0.7987247,0.006863205,0.0003390255,0.0003262762,0.0002672412,0.0003038362,0.1215961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8342901,0.0003627109,0.1567454,0.0003816338,0.0001271117,0.0002759159,0.0002037002,0.00007149179,0.007542024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01537365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08130461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01467202955076423,"score_gpt":0.3397208606678457,"score_spread":0.3250488311170814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}