{"id":"W3125260050","doi":"10.1515/ijld-2017-0002","title":"Arguments of statutory interpretation and argumentation schemes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Discourse","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Defeasible estate; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory interpretation; Defeasible reasoning; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Statutory law; Inference; Computer science; Mathematics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003248611,0.00007564852,0.0001304083,0.000155634,0.00006956539,0.0003227131,0.0007051498,0.00002573894,0.00001116294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001067924,0.00006427675,0.00006711359,0.00001857186,0.00006366582,0.002656454,0.0001103685,0.00008216075,0.000002921237],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004885144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006904589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005638521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008536585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988471,0.00003815694,0.0004159299,0.0001064553,0.0005186598,0.00007364683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982227,0.0000299217,0.0011519,0.0001733227,0.0003691788,0.00005299042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005794959,0.001003654,0.1455527,0.0001202859,0.001396001,0.0002580307,0.01116738,0.000605788,0.1009482,0.2972283,0.002368662,0.4387715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006969491,0.0006907354,0.8429687,0.001361203,0.0001098996,0.0003975815,0.001172163,0.07419021,0.0573415,0.0060759,0.008149073,0.0005735715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7912658,0.0001301362,0.2042388,0.001513222,0.002073605,0.00007053309,0.000006837864,0.000005692704,0.0006953391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948297,0.00004884225,0.004761464,0.00004673708,0.000145264,0.000001250439,0.000002154296,0.000003980211,0.0001606101],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6974159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3111929,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01467202955076423,"score_gpt":0.3397208606678457,"score_spread":0.3250488311170814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}