{"id":"W3125300207","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.05.014","title":"Do banks overstate their Value-at-Risk?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Banking & Finance","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Goddard Space Flight Center; Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce","keywords":"Diversification (marketing strategy); Conservatism; Value at risk; Economics; Actuarial science; Sample (material); Risk management; Profit (economics); Econometrics; Value (mathematics); Business; Statistics; Finance; Mathematics; Marketing; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003711784,0.000223529,0.0006291351,0.0003391253,0.0002768111,0.00008367094,0.0004049653,0.0001614827,0.0001310184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003171955,0.0002267788,0.0003607615,0.0003538433,0.00007028323,0.0004351333,0.00008925825,0.0005930631,0.00009816619],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000518422,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001045428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002528582,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975386,0.00002181984,0.001493,0.0003200965,0.000114817,0.0005116689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997277,0.0001969469,0.001964209,0.0003536384,0.0001254709,0.00008272207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008692521,0.0003553608,0.5533314,0.0000858869,0.0001864136,0.0001875805,0.007315609,0.01060196,0.0002926859,0.3177151,0.003117844,0.1059409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002026467,0.0004576541,0.4093597,0.0003083907,0.00002910833,0.0001207342,0.0001170488,0.00988589,0.001154677,0.2462894,0.329493,0.0007579278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9152144,0.008845261,0.06597506,0.0001482059,0.001126033,0.00008553079,0.00005210015,0.00001619213,0.008537229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914336,0.002436838,0.005175381,0.0001633361,0.0004206152,8.623926e-7,0.000001377717,0.0000331784,0.0003348118],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3263752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.924777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0287177014759855,"score_gpt":0.234372067731506,"score_spread":0.2056543662555205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}