{"id":"W3125356111","doi":"","title":"Peer Review in Canada: Results from a Promising Experiment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Skepticism; Peer review; Political science; Criminal justice; Public relations; Legal profession; Competence (human resources); Quality assurance; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Service (business)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04627203,0.0009732961,0.001744045,0.001357844,0.01269355,0.005911097,0.003074817,0.00298015,0.008404612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1437317,0.0006635787,0.0008543595,0.003039839,0.004706196,0.003383372,0.00288758,0.002454219,0.001842974],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03661298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1082238,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8413109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8913158,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9405264,0.02761679,0.00176179,0.004046077,0.02223368,0.003815166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8148074,0.09558523,0.007784528,0.01137352,0.06085421,0.00959516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.05538858,0.0931867,0.09968068,0.00550441,0.001345133,0.001901533,0.07651271,0.008091827,0.0100843,0.03461208,0.08204851,0.5316436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04285227,0.06843847,0.4300512,0.002880803,0.002405022,0.0007288255,0.06745428,0.04514857,0.01448793,0.03093645,0.2925691,0.002047104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8889834,0.002325713,0.004561889,0.005411947,0.0004606426,0.01590375,0.001696009,0.0003779611,0.08027868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9249939,0.002482263,0.01808864,0.003177393,0.0001581156,0.006509054,0.001333413,0.0001802507,0.04307687],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.963387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3192474,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.109602211566468,"score_gpt":0.3751558718356326,"score_spread":0.2655536602691647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}