{"id":"W3125400653","doi":"","title":"MATCHING MARKETS UNDER (IN)COMPLETE INFORMATION","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Complete information; Nash equilibrium; Bayesian game; Matching (statistics); Incomplete markets; Best response; Economics; Preference; Mathematical economics; Bayesian probability; Epsilon-equilibrium; Mechanism (biology); Correlated equilibrium; Equilibrium selection; Microeconomics; Information asymmetry; Repeated game; Game theory; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005833641,0.0007966799,0.003088357,0.001708166,0.001355795,0.006092467,0.002565437,0.00552411,0.03146881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04300879,0.0009749486,0.001394789,0.002072352,0.002583728,0.01295025,0.003552669,0.002574074,0.004145249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002381816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001962717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002947775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001761556,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951299,0.001411817,0.0003366034,0.001177642,0.0009821254,0.0009619568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760409,0.01368519,0.004341912,0.002724617,0.001802117,0.001405273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003197834,0.0001167098,0.001206435,0.0002361366,0.00008048124,0.0003445789,0.0001787814,0.02632261,0.0005186237,0.9228067,0.0151055,0.03276371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001606027,0.00009168738,0.0007234268,0.0000492837,0.0000277656,0.0002247347,0.00006267479,0.1002559,0.0002260776,0.8917745,0.006358675,0.00004468414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.299634,0.005471418,0.4849919,0.02695341,0.001164317,0.0004086329,0.00416388,0.001413423,0.1757989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9163469,0.002687162,0.02411671,0.001942884,0.001773235,0.0003179864,0.001357691,0.0002273144,0.05123013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03146881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1052737,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0541435000877123,"score_gpt":0.2403318060919191,"score_spread":0.1861883060042069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}