{"id":"W3125417866","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.49318","title":"'Pocket and Pot': Hypothetical Bias in a No-Free-Riding Public Contribution Game","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Public good; Free riding; Public goods game; Economics; Sample (material); Dictatorship; Investment (military); Service (business); Microeconomics; Private good; Public economics; Political science; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007964666,0.0004064163,0.0007034366,0.0003275346,0.0005702896,0.001396865,0.0006886747,0.001335419,0.002958836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04178831,0.0002516552,0.0003087428,0.0002166795,0.002502362,0.001888019,0.0009901036,0.001281664,0.0002884376],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001436786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001065794,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002467192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00315394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942675,0.004274794,0.0001835356,0.0003054535,0.0006701995,0.0002986677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762561,0.01847969,0.002289931,0.001472204,0.0005194227,0.0009826989],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01272189,0.002315921,0.09734107,0.000568769,0.0004528366,0.002030053,0.01265647,0.07132074,0.04557549,0.6220258,0.007309127,0.1256818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001693107,0.003535184,0.05868874,0.0001671201,0.0002179913,0.0009752191,0.003863533,0.4409718,0.01095195,0.4660335,0.01260341,0.0002985094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9428125,0.00005765616,0.03816523,0.001871409,0.00004211655,0.0002733902,0.00008208342,0.00006725598,0.01662832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916339,0.00002614799,0.00622387,0.0002269465,0.00000621068,0.00007614672,0.00001755451,0.000006388937,0.001782732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9920353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04212171,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08730076961228124,"score_gpt":0.3079680384687988,"score_spread":0.2206672688565176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}