{"id":"W3125435210","doi":"","title":"Competition under Credit Rationing: Theory and Evidence from Rural China","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Microfinance and Financial Inclusion","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Credit rationing; China; Economics; Duopoly; Loan; Monetary economics; Interest rate; Portfolio; Business; Microeconomics; Finance; Cournot competition","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001597921,0.0002648593,0.0006199736,0.0009639072,0.0008928929,0.001199736,0.0007395592,0.000706312,0.005370196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004060361,0.0002267111,0.0003568077,0.001562953,0.002607067,0.001067985,0.0007974858,0.0005170987,0.000227723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002199928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001142955,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06913918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04192228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995041,0.0002156068,0.00002201679,0.00007535411,0.00006152265,0.0001214378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937536,0.003269897,0.001876236,0.0003049301,0.000348017,0.0004472716],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00116497,0.001343679,0.6891643,0.0006114201,0.0003274928,0.002143549,0.007288026,0.08061884,0.003546163,0.1447394,0.003451292,0.06560093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007359724,0.0009536348,0.6546541,0.0001539505,0.0002503411,0.0005911091,0.007077087,0.2166319,0.001118716,0.1097435,0.007970585,0.000119257],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918569,0.0005007025,0.001428439,0.0005025663,0.000001975598,0.0000219575,0.00007923926,0.000009158407,0.005599044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999334,0.0002127917,0.0001472018,0.00003118442,0.000004506595,0.000004636389,0.00002570597,0.000001009255,0.000238946],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06913918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1374735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01347439545996722,"score_gpt":0.2180789317416866,"score_spread":0.2046045362817194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}