{"id":"W3125568853","doi":"","title":"LITIGATING CANADA-U.S. TRANSBOUNDARY HARM: INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAWMAKING AND THE THREAT OF EXTRATERRITORIAL RECIPROCITY","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Scholarship; Extraterritoriality; International law; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Lawmaking; Harm; Context (archaeology); Sovereignty; Environmental law; Customary international law; Law; State (computer science); Political economy; Sociology; Jurisdiction; Legislature; Public international law; Politics; Geography; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003507426,0.000448654,0.0004869702,0.001498787,0.02728154,0.01276784,0.00256858,0.01015507,0.00550636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009471042,0.0003792112,0.0005470771,0.002298527,0.01513671,0.003772981,0.005246864,0.007315008,0.0003095413],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0862163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1590577,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9800324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903722,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935517,0.0006755003,0.000136791,0.0006092922,0.002484196,0.002542509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996004,0.001731984,0.0002284792,0.0001408612,0.001354567,0.0005400473],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001279028,0.00001472689,0.002100364,0.00005305122,0.00001529817,0.0006703212,0.009026401,0.0005201656,0.0001945184,0.9559436,0.02203405,0.009414654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007286089,0.00005779551,0.01184618,0.0006991613,0.0002773642,0.001001627,0.05836759,0.003982777,0.002064203,0.2597821,0.6616016,0.0002467152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08821695,0.007326197,0.003962191,0.1583183,0.0005372734,0.00008636453,0.0001964462,0.00006444692,0.7412918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.913681,0.003712487,0.001746592,0.02771922,0.0001131896,0.00003610458,0.00006361189,0.00003324018,0.05289452],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0862163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.625546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.002906907043576151,"score_gpt":0.2038338027932904,"score_spread":0.2009268957497143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}