{"id":"W3125568853","doi":"","title":"LITIGATING CANADA-U.S. TRANSBOUNDARY HARM: INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAWMAKING AND THE THREAT OF EXTRATERRITORIAL RECIPROCITY","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Scholarship; Extraterritoriality; International law; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Lawmaking; Harm; Context (archaeology); Sovereignty; Environmental law; Customary international law; Law; State (computer science); Political economy; Sociology; Jurisdiction; Legislature; Public international law; Politics; Geography; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002069473,0.0001211744,0.0001319642,0.00001952359,0.0002532172,0.00004484865,0.0003366492,0.0000450128,0.0003287578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005038833,0.00009135711,0.00005876079,0.00004378102,0.0003868017,0.0002293103,0.00008245843,0.0007675451,0.000003764938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001647797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002538145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1247424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3787172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980094,0.0000634033,0.0003446244,0.0001647507,0.0006400704,0.000777733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995179,0.0001687561,0.0001693917,0.00007897869,0.00000972502,0.00005527232],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00294208,0.0002889798,0.2840587,0.00001732667,0.0009180527,0.00008366656,0.004194948,0.0004049364,0.03656623,0.4951517,0.0005442175,0.1748291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01468139,0.0006620575,0.2050533,0.0001830832,0.0002532876,0.004209316,0.01258431,0.002341791,0.02554479,0.6606907,0.07232783,0.001468197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894751,0.0004139189,0.001097259,0.001000195,0.000729751,0.0001068593,0.000009555288,0.000006732793,0.00716061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983312,0.0002866759,0.0002207142,0.0001027543,0.0005825731,0.000002060287,0.000004711283,0.00001195283,0.0004573292],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2539749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8810861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.002906907043576151,"score_gpt":0.2038338027932904,"score_spread":0.2009268957497143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}