{"id":"W3125651549","doi":"10.1016/j.jfi.2011.07.002","title":"Idiosyncratic volatility vs. liquidity? Evidence from the US corporate bond market","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial Intermediation","topic":"Credit Risk and Financial Regulations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Market liquidity; Corporate bond; Volatility (finance); Economics; Bond; Monetary economics; Bond market; Equity (law); Accounting liquidity; Liquidity crisis; Liquidity risk; Shock (circulatory); Financial economics; Econometrics; Finance; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001375071,0.0001549485,0.000423518,0.0001443818,0.000150735,0.00006675623,0.0004151333,0.0001451567,0.0005252489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003097084,0.0001322261,0.0002320099,0.0002704873,0.0001254236,0.0008450144,0.00005562568,0.0003430461,0.00007600847],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001492895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001569668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003929567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003054613,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981759,0.00004957196,0.001252001,0.0002075285,0.0001104438,0.0002045278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967889,0.0002767124,0.002335839,0.0003019825,0.0002062974,0.00009030959],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000634972,0.000142655,0.9540753,0.00001420857,0.00003728237,0.00002042465,0.003670822,0.0000138258,0.00008289088,0.006867665,0.02905439,0.005385553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003174853,0.000246372,0.9493621,0.00009777423,0.000023586,0.000006501076,0.00002238228,0.001733147,0.0002410828,0.04219671,0.005617048,0.0001358059],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822661,0.001352342,0.01192708,0.0004597658,0.002664914,0.0001625164,0.0001236923,0.00001083543,0.001032727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969956,0.0005320699,0.0008420353,0.0001307958,0.001350602,0.000006881086,0.000006556268,0.00001363051,0.000121848],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03532904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5751107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07450879069807154,"score_gpt":0.2301578151444589,"score_spread":0.1556490244463873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}