{"id":"W3125685521","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.261181","title":"Employment, Dynamic Deterrence and Crime","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Deterrence (psychology); Commit; Incentive; Neglect; Deterrence theory; Economics; Criminal behavior; Criminology; Panel data; Public economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Law and economics; Econometrics; Psychology; Computer science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008475121,0.0002663151,0.0004645298,0.0009750842,0.0009127907,0.001815436,0.0003203655,0.001437026,0.01536567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005154608,0.0002637777,0.0002145168,0.001735899,0.001093164,0.001116185,0.0009231899,0.0009941715,0.0005725599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006585515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009982673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00717586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01179747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996954,0.0001371708,0.00001318176,0.00003185266,0.00004316307,0.00007917341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962669,0.002438388,0.0006839354,0.0001099723,0.0001401967,0.0003606189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00164971,0.0035613,0.6741373,0.0004690578,0.0003624822,0.001330444,0.003029983,0.008271407,0.0007528025,0.164179,0.01456913,0.1276873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002079447,0.0006636449,0.7270085,0.0001976934,0.0002039852,0.0007254165,0.006255751,0.01012828,0.0001917208,0.2450901,0.009297817,0.00002918765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9512861,0.005443126,0.001861335,0.01306475,0.0001140243,0.00002548786,0.0004806403,0.00001494795,0.02770973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912066,0.002702093,0.0002250434,0.0001849763,0.0001445282,0.00001603883,0.00008633979,0.000003432062,0.00543105],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01536567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05140322,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03198805184927182,"score_gpt":0.3680649696183001,"score_spread":0.3360769177690283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}