{"id":"W3125768953","doi":"10.29173/alr237","title":"Which <i>Kraft</i> of Statutory Interpretation? A Supreme Court of Canada Trilogy on Intellectual Property Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Statute; Law; Statutory law; Supreme court; Trilogy; Legislative intent; Legislature; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Legislation; Judicial interpretation; Discretion; Intellectual property; Normative; Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01241547,0.0003713725,0.0007353111,0.003241799,0.01048524,0.01988223,0.002568007,0.008194651,0.004141372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01847561,0.0005508103,0.0005932226,0.004094501,0.05382155,0.00796635,0.002186176,0.01010075,0.0005483509],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07800043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09323192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.831797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8847818,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9884065,0.003692663,0.0003458206,0.00116572,0.004160876,0.002228512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897715,0.005195841,0.0005852912,0.0005315438,0.003260273,0.0006553726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003042059,0.000003451499,0.0002126926,0.00001858968,0.00000272344,0.00002822793,0.0007772219,0.00005867305,0.00001963366,0.9816428,0.01209422,0.005138882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002653972,0.000009542397,0.002419471,0.0007873064,0.00003876342,0.00006536062,0.003742344,0.001171678,0.0002653784,0.7923238,0.1990902,0.0000596764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01506027,0.0408377,0.00792164,0.5109774,0.001934068,0.00007636388,0.0002538524,0.00006804262,0.4228707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8372515,0.02405813,0.008351979,0.06626423,0.00190277,0.0001253183,0.0001322748,0.0001241535,0.06178962],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.168203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5659354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02536076190339221,"score_gpt":0.2784343435409271,"score_spread":0.2530735816375349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}