{"id":"W3125777417","doi":"","title":"Canadian Climate Federalism: Parliament’s Ample Constitutional Authority to Legislate GHG Emissions through Regulations, a National Cap and Trade Program, or a National Carbon Tax","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Parliament; Carbon tax; Constitution; Jurisdiction; Greenhouse gas; Commerce Clause; Emissions trading; Legislature; Law; Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Cooperative federalism; Economics; Law and economics; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009491199,0.0002067837,0.000224473,0.0002956174,0.002004475,0.0002025721,0.0002390938,0.0002415262,0.0003274986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003328179,0.0002063869,0.00008825307,0.000631134,0.001234461,0.0005849635,0.00003476081,0.0001693255,0.00003101184],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004700302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01368733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2148225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6624242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997295,0.0001394346,0.0004338104,0.000502308,0.0009234403,0.0007060698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979041,0.0004536573,0.0001760817,0.0001309896,0.0005727379,0.0007624038],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002547065,0.00005863242,0.002083255,0.00001556414,0.00003441429,0.00001477328,0.001125371,0.0001294513,0.00005733121,0.9687426,0.02676644,0.0009467086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000870432,0.00002735132,0.01304615,0.0002537826,0.00002389929,0.0001382299,0.0001951979,0.000484609,0.00001992307,0.09210322,0.8924106,0.0004266073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05123697,0.0005990597,0.007370384,0.6457782,0.001473181,0.004404652,0.02762997,0.0005026049,0.2610049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820845,0.0001791919,0.004406286,0.004537343,0.0008529487,0.0003796858,0.0001289028,0.00001343705,0.007417776],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9308475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0417525047389458,"score_gpt":0.3187750178305256,"score_spread":0.2770225130915798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}