{"id":"W3125852312","doi":"","title":"Taking the Dialectical Stance in Reasoning with Evidence and Proof","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Probabilistic logic; Defeasible reasoning; Epistemology; Deductive reasoning; Computer science; Probabilistic argumentation; Statistical evidence; Burden of proof; Psychology; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Econometrics; Philosophy; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01875832,0.001207966,0.001255885,0.00621506,0.003678808,0.01084202,0.003721325,0.005354141,0.005692111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03949303,0.001074778,0.002464272,0.003886668,0.02405842,0.03009542,0.01112229,0.005541822,0.0009068923],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003772377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002390089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001656773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001641611,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9806754,0.01262258,0.001155697,0.001678632,0.003415333,0.000452388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9661537,0.02511985,0.002007433,0.003898107,0.002080113,0.0007407746],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006727054,0.000005439241,0.0001018039,0.00003225763,0.00001094272,0.0000336217,0.0003900766,0.001008735,0.00004186919,0.995299,0.0001207503,0.002948862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006833659,0.000006938129,0.00003753823,0.00002421659,0.00001006424,0.00003663552,0.00009669856,0.003653152,0.00009844444,0.9933321,0.002690362,0.000006971917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008041084,0.001076528,0.9496859,0.008515824,0.0001755353,0.0000822642,0.00008368632,0.0001090679,0.03223008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4593702,0.001045008,0.5335958,0.0009875251,0.0002854472,0.0003863022,0.0001178375,0.00009367093,0.004118097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01875832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0992046,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04241828367771747,"score_gpt":0.3624269828679143,"score_spread":0.3200086991901968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}