{"id":"W3125885139","doi":"","title":"Negotiation-proof Nash Equilibrium","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Epsilon-equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Negotiation; Best response; Equilibrium selection; Trembling hand perfect equilibrium; Computer science; Solution concept; Futures studies; Sequential equilibrium; Correlated equilibrium; Bargaining problem; Economics; Microeconomics; Game theory; Repeated game; Political science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009092945,0.000147899,0.000128386,0.0002446187,0.0002502177,0.000322122,0.0002384803,0.00007662259,0.0002975282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000671162,0.0001338444,0.00006739188,0.0008421985,0.00002752748,0.00233685,0.00004302743,0.0008412777,0.0002962673],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001918526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003830371,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001085751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002728959,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978977,0.000008020461,0.000297983,0.0001640464,0.0002444504,0.001387797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992875,0.000009478857,0.0002639419,0.000128692,0.0003017353,0.000008626927],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007223133,0.00007723689,0.0170601,0.00001669874,0.0000578008,0.000006692404,0.000008959279,0.0002474425,0.001144733,0.9549193,0.001306481,0.02508233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001313246,0.00004992669,0.01390933,0.00003562406,0.00006631204,0.0003241703,0.0005955543,0.003276371,0.00009806351,0.8786986,0.1011653,0.0004675282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9021794,0.0009014161,0.02236197,0.01008942,0.00122212,0.0002012919,3.515691e-7,0.0001678873,0.06287616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937431,0.0001597112,0.00002273852,0.00108301,0.003063906,0.000003835991,0.00001813951,0.0000254075,0.001880154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09985881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5458016,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01292719982362866,"score_gpt":0.2211599400655943,"score_spread":0.2082327402419657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}