{"id":"W3125984553","doi":"10.7202/1067947ar","title":"PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION IN THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: THE PROTECTION OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND THE GAP BETWEEN LEGAL VICTORIES AND SOCIAL CHANGE","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Human rights; Legislation; Law; Economic Justice; Public interest; Latin Americans","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0237681,0.0004506276,0.0007563561,0.001768032,0.02443453,0.02106722,0.004092722,0.02654791,0.007120728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03372611,0.000477409,0.0007393633,0.003505007,0.02985073,0.01055973,0.008642319,0.01664448,0.000371284],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03367656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04174635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3000402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4089706,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9800961,0.008585986,0.0005332298,0.001356426,0.003768447,0.005659789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753396,0.01914243,0.001261422,0.0005580885,0.002222488,0.001475948],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005775394,0.00006367478,0.001471317,0.00007733867,0.00002823876,0.001035332,0.02246574,0.0002646278,0.0002419508,0.8987467,0.06201909,0.0135284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002029504,0.0000745673,0.01379621,0.001732834,0.0001898143,0.000583829,0.0888008,0.001946535,0.001658763,0.425448,0.4653265,0.0002391818],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07764659,0.03214788,0.0009706232,0.6489439,0.00150536,0.00005396011,0.00009338804,0.00002703341,0.2386113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9227336,0.006204562,0.0004094021,0.04454796,0.001668039,0.00007017703,0.0000412642,0.00002897162,0.02429598],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3000402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5965874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05360372105557375,"score_gpt":0.2383356773930639,"score_spread":0.1847319563374902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}