{"id":"W3126243429","doi":"10.1002/phar.2509","title":"Comparative effectiveness and safety of high‐dose rivaroxaban and apixaban for atrial fibrillation: A propensity score‐matched cohort study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy","topic":"Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Heart Institute; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Rivaroxaban; Apixaban; Atrial fibrillation; Propensity score matching; Hazard ratio; Cohort; Internal medicine; Stroke (engine); Warfarin; Population; Cohort study; Myocardial infarction; Randomized controlled trial; Surgery; Confidence interval","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01208561,0.0006617895,0.0008870566,0.001233442,0.0009140797,0.00122919,0.001206052,0.0009937283,0.002403852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01904343,0.0004348815,0.002758796,0.001873423,0.0007328014,0.000779186,0.0008768452,0.0008694933,0.0002835715],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002007517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002725716,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02162354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01791247,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920098,0.003045671,0.001065438,0.001812721,0.001587934,0.0004784661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814336,0.00336278,0.008006484,0.003975683,0.00197875,0.001242718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01341746,0.0005040267,0.9664797,0.0001853125,0.01156074,0.0001198325,0.0001541868,0.0005338728,0.0004310835,0.0004917643,0.0007961076,0.005325987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003750762,0.00390454,0.9784369,0.00008766702,0.005735609,0.0002931694,0.0001614047,0.004453046,0.0003201535,0.0004984231,0.002292065,0.00006626472],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911378,0.001417353,0.002418835,0.0001713727,0.00009505162,0.0007385081,0.003052257,0.00001399512,0.0009549611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964887,0.0002833355,0.0008041293,0.0001511007,0.00006232465,0.0002749483,0.001688689,0.000006104721,0.0002407177],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02162354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06391561,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08363712816402659,"score_gpt":0.3987668556479787,"score_spread":0.3151297274839521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}