{"id":"W3126641309","doi":"10.1002/ccd.29546","title":"Left atrial appendage occlusion in chicken‐wing anatomies: Imaging assessment, procedural, and clinical outcomes of the “sandwich technique”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","topic":"Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Heart Institute; Vancouver General Hospital; University of British Columbia","funders":"Novo Nordisk Fonden","keywords":"Medicine; Appendage; Occlusion; Left atrial appendage occlusion; Atrial Appendage; Cardiology; Internal medicine; Radiology; Atrial fibrillation; Anatomy; Warfarin","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007549145,0.0001150163,0.0004394244,0.0001204574,0.0001133308,0.00004229882,0.00005642897,0.00006221254,0.00005155044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002986854,0.00008666309,0.001486184,0.0002260136,0.0000906412,0.0001177488,0.000216811,0.0001292285,5.756573e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002358663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005084902,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001275532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001335339,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986349,0.0002304301,0.0005507825,0.0002603157,0.0002173079,0.0001062017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993815,0.00005173456,0.0001179994,0.0003101822,0.00009473792,0.000043863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001081983,0.00001874691,0.995151,0.0001899811,0.0004912164,0.000007578521,0.00008208579,0.00001201337,0.0005960675,0.0002985892,0.0000238436,0.00311808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001630681,0.00002571776,0.9936774,0.0003517373,0.0006675483,0.00005211623,0.0003880817,0.0004721423,0.0002820811,0.0001127203,0.002242977,0.00009678396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9596702,0.002131287,0.03347631,0.002218432,0.0005081394,0.00115762,0.00001453566,0.00005544703,0.0007680401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982291,0.000618288,0.0006018315,0.00008909708,0.00007537458,0.000001052952,0.00004207084,0.00001381664,0.0003293584],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03855892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3534019,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04647879790737076,"score_gpt":0.3812039745144728,"score_spread":0.334725176607102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}