{"id":"W3126701592","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1736","title":"Analysis of some incentives on two‐echelon reverse supply chain with a strategic consumer: The case of unwanted medications in households","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Sustainable Supply Chain Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Stackelberg competition; Supply chain; Novelty; Incentive; Business; Marketing; Game theory; Perspective (graphical); Reverse logistics; Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Advertising; Economics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002517512,0.0005496014,0.0009662468,0.001020997,0.001738755,0.002241016,0.001402108,0.003102588,0.01048433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005631205,0.0005678826,0.001200726,0.0007745945,0.001538681,0.002409363,0.001750554,0.001257329,0.000295464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002890157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002170907,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01243975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007498229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982513,0.0007839283,0.00005321883,0.0002274119,0.0001894604,0.0004947617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948419,0.003215027,0.0006307784,0.0001931448,0.0005364796,0.0005826131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006345091,0.0006641184,0.01283871,0.0002690892,0.0001165689,0.003948927,0.0007327719,0.6806293,0.003303014,0.2785822,0.002406893,0.01587385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007259214,0.0002143976,0.001681486,0.00002498036,0.00005607496,0.0002246983,0.0007781171,0.962088,0.0005636701,0.03247407,0.001779846,0.00004207494],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7983998,0.0005534497,0.1679371,0.002340463,0.00007845725,0.0003457694,0.0002038429,0.00009821608,0.03004289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885588,0.0001276571,0.005219079,0.00004333078,0.00001444937,0.00004466342,0.00002344171,0.000007036705,0.005961597],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01243975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03507358,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03013419148265584,"score_gpt":0.3063452142952283,"score_spread":0.2762110228125725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}