{"id":"W3127148673","doi":"10.1038/s41598-021-82715-1","title":"Ensemble bias correction of climate simulations: preserving internal variability","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften; Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Bildung und Kultus, Wissenschaft und Kunst; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Mitacs; Leibniz-Rechenzentrum; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal; European Commission; Gauss Centre for Supercomputing; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung","keywords":"Quantile; Ensemble average; Climate change; Ensemble forecasting; Environmental science; Econometrics; Climatology; Ensemble learning; Climate model; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Geology; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00268265,0.000093252,0.0001560984,0.00003679184,0.0002343322,0.0001108109,0.0001103272,0.00006001621,0.005068576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001479236,0.00009088145,0.00009104828,0.0005057808,0.0002268965,0.0003512626,0.0004318857,0.00009388239,0.00003560105],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001190771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005076751,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002507579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003706965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978881,0.0001517238,0.0005864791,0.0006809852,0.0004500261,0.0002426863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984386,0.0002013187,0.0002704038,0.0009308351,0.00008003646,0.00007878393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001762255,0.0004928766,0.5214574,0.00007429185,0.00001372562,0.00007637096,0.0009216963,0.1896597,0.2784948,0.00009162919,0.003239992,0.005459866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003247744,0.00005951408,0.05767887,0.0001800449,0.00008189266,0.0003682362,0.0003031592,0.5046641,0.3032078,0.08990127,0.04267159,0.0005586894],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9602827,0.000008165288,0.002485885,0.00004986413,0.005525528,0.0001690536,0.000005446448,0.00003897331,0.03143442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966749,0.000004250291,0.001219549,0.00001564299,0.00001855825,0.000005936171,0.00003640317,0.000006763029,0.002018025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4637785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958409,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03236535889020265,"score_gpt":0.2712295434292049,"score_spread":0.2388641845390023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}