{"id":"W3132034123","doi":"10.1111/rec.13359","title":"A structured approach to remediation site assessment: lessons from 15 years of fish spawning habitat creation in the St. <scp>Clair‐Detroit</scp> River System","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Restoration Ecology","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Habitat; Dam removal; Restoration ecology; Context (archaeology); Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Stream restoration; Sediment; Ecology; Fishery; Geography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004214828,0.00009596491,0.0001838522,0.00006838083,0.00009683627,0.00001854878,0.0001557449,0.000163273,0.00009811152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001523037,0.00009225059,0.00003085484,0.0003978706,0.00009092902,0.0002405367,0.00003378243,0.0001584497,0.00003029132],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002136731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006253152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001740966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008381734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986317,0.0003144782,0.0002925935,0.0003133183,0.0002551142,0.0001928155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993046,0.0002681123,0.0001549553,0.0002025504,0.00002647611,0.0000433233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001927081,0.0002399678,0.9051225,0.00004347955,0.00003301868,0.00003406749,0.01098378,0.06600951,0.01156627,0.002505899,0.002780536,0.0006617194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003686563,0.00006626469,0.9923117,0.000009259109,0.00002974749,0.000004321363,0.0009986239,0.002963542,0.0005595337,0.0004021575,0.002241699,0.00004454454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915518,0.00001792909,0.005310429,0.0005568407,0.0001431583,0.000268597,0.00004369062,0.00002236838,0.002085254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960092,0.000009680171,0.002736655,0.0004245184,0.00004358069,0.00005469983,0.0006568118,0.000007737487,0.00005716452],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08718916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4677204,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01189553829052327,"score_gpt":0.2423562805447154,"score_spread":0.2304607422541921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}