{"id":"W3132625123","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12920","title":"Care to Wager Again? An Appraisal of Paul Ehrlich's Counterbet Offer to Julian Simon, Part 2: Critical Analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Timeline; Proxy (statistics); Critical appraisal; Relevance (law); Positive economics; Balance (ability); Economics; Perspective (graphical); Welfare; Period (music); Psychology; History; Law; Statistics; Political science; Philosophy; Medicine; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1097175,0.001228712,0.001295453,0.011173,0.01024214,0.01521414,0.002822203,0.008966634,0.00171908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2898279,0.000678711,0.0009825311,0.008003263,0.03337238,0.016196,0.005902868,0.01245156,0.0002444677],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03254617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02910979,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01131437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01219815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9222914,0.05082067,0.00369006,0.002964262,0.01779727,0.002436393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6609229,0.2953846,0.009152228,0.002696695,0.02967533,0.00216819],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000135126,0.00004825955,0.0007369157,0.002967735,0.00007794682,0.0003891666,0.05319864,0.0003186916,0.0001852431,0.4337502,0.4327929,0.07539935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003855001,0.00008976139,0.00166082,0.01560472,0.00005214353,0.000220357,0.05486722,0.0003932213,0.0005653873,0.123407,0.8029749,0.0001259346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004899515,0.2312581,0.00173677,0.7380835,0.01543874,0.0001688626,0.00004230711,0.00002051525,0.008351765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2572656,0.2714521,0.006225579,0.4210615,0.03416487,0.001403608,0.00009676486,0.0001413916,0.008188613],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1097175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5802485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05470053620252566,"score_gpt":0.3007138366537168,"score_spread":0.2460133004511911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}