{"id":"W3132891376","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2019-0349","title":"Methodology for seismic risk screening of existing buildings in Canada: Non-structural component scoring system","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Seismic Performance and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Component (thermodynamics); Seismic risk; Risk assessment; Occupancy; Earthquake scenario; Engineering; Induced seismicity; Civil engineering; Reliability engineering; Forensic engineering; Seismic hazard; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004877278,0.0001706258,0.0005513455,0.000469262,0.00005450919,0.00001934396,0.0001914892,0.00005757525,0.000009994819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001671111,0.0001925403,0.0001329121,0.0003805646,0.00001127253,0.0001374707,0.00001092393,0.000339247,1.24975e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009267722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009985106,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3947184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9262342,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986196,0.00002301008,0.0006653768,0.0001126108,0.0001329656,0.0004464629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990979,0.000190474,0.0001689473,0.0001262859,0.0001422646,0.00027411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002369992,3.952976e-7,0.009450256,0.0003174181,0.0001228873,0.0001310489,0.0002341076,0.9838536,0.003882714,0.00002932155,0.0000455584,0.001930284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004201074,0.00001131569,0.00889529,0.0008326238,0.00007433738,0.0002572994,0.001039539,0.9815296,0.006088982,0.00000799873,0.0006420605,0.0002008522],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7057741,0.001298379,0.2921044,0.00001483863,0.000647739,0.00004233322,0.00002414375,0.000009697203,0.00008433456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851835,0.00002938846,0.01455898,0.00001312928,0.0001702827,0.000002692311,0.000003926978,0.00003436031,0.000003734228],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5315158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7851567,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02833318408211165,"score_gpt":0.2237854158297452,"score_spread":0.1954522317476335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}