{"id":"W3133498523","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110412","title":"When is lack of scientific integrity a reason for retracting a paper? A case study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Misconduct; Rigour; Randomized controlled trial; Psychology; Retract; MEDLINE; Clinical trial; Research ethics; Intervention (counseling); Medicine; Alternative medicine; Law; Psychiatry; Political science; Surgery; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03270834,0.00009491275,0.0003791994,0.0003324543,0.0009392783,0.0003104698,0.0005659025,0.0003623062,0.0006940003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01407296,0.00007840306,0.0002142868,0.001089171,0.0004242878,0.0005172354,0.00006402364,0.003027978,0.00001142778],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001740496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00152927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002201742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00183899,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940911,0.002118923,0.0008827203,0.000244792,0.002196955,0.0004655012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921126,0.003168274,0.0004936563,0.0003100436,0.003684912,0.0002304821],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003674211,0.002414618,0.02654748,0.000480201,0.0003805516,0.002678726,0.7455723,7.709059e-7,0.004092751,0.004673714,0.165418,0.04737344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001654551,0.0008190869,0.001013814,0.001139571,0.00008630529,0.001564283,0.8032442,0.0002770107,0.001108449,0.1340398,0.05485305,0.0001999044],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788466,0.0004340778,0.0004154685,0.01453838,0.0007122371,0.0005522991,0.00001039043,0.000005940429,0.004484604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990163,0.00009277117,0.007151947,0.00009738419,0.0004978584,0.00001079805,4.930974e-7,0.00001070186,0.001975102],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1293661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999272,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.354830279712967,"score_gpt":0.5416823567239716,"score_spread":0.1868520770110045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}