{"id":"W3133506592","doi":"10.2113/eeg-d-20-00016","title":"Steep Creek Risk Assessment for Pipeline Design : A Case Study From British Columbia, Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental and Engineering Geoscience","topic":"Landslides and related hazards","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"BGC Engineering (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Pipeline transport; Debris flow; Terrain; Geohazard; Landslide; Channel (broadcasting); Pipeline (software); Geology; Bedrock; Hydrology (agriculture); Debris; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental science; Engineering; Geotechnical engineering; Geomorphology; Cartography; Geography; Environmental engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008891302,0.0006929434,0.0002749494,0.002022785,0.003725599,0.002103915,0.001335953,0.001039061,0.002973737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002814132,0.0003887192,0.0003530554,0.002817248,0.0008972458,0.0005279849,0.0008382853,0.0007604641,0.0002658353],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03028426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02944949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9728252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989706,0.0001428121,0.00004288863,0.00009131154,0.0005291629,0.0002231483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976095,0.0004936848,0.0001589048,0.00009221663,0.001405954,0.0002398025],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004423062,0.001210245,0.4680295,0.0004737124,0.0001633438,0.02295264,0.009297921,0.2349781,0.008474558,0.008182826,0.0216928,0.2241022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001492366,0.001061946,0.4600854,0.0004652628,0.0002462605,0.004376587,0.0658511,0.3949338,0.008059078,0.005422304,0.0589912,0.0003578618],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9679859,0.0003559609,0.007260523,0.0007260288,0.00001576481,0.000488612,0.001033309,0.000145793,0.02198811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771942,0.0004601541,0.007542916,0.0001001687,0.000004163463,0.00006473214,0.0004690335,0.00003295494,0.01413149],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03028426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2197287,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00441514395856148,"score_gpt":0.1717119995999331,"score_spread":0.1672968556413716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}