{"id":"W3133506592","doi":"10.2113/eeg-d-20-00016","title":"Steep Creek Risk Assessment for Pipeline Design : A Case Study From British Columbia, Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental and Engineering Geoscience","topic":"Landslides and related hazards","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"BGC Engineering (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Pipeline transport; Debris flow; Terrain; Geohazard; Landslide; Channel (broadcasting); Pipeline (software); Geology; Bedrock; Hydrology (agriculture); Debris; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental science; Engineering; Geotechnical engineering; Geomorphology; Cartography; Geography; Environmental engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002294865,0.0001260603,0.0001661994,0.00000603661,0.0004165143,0.0002597478,0.0001280097,0.00004628665,0.0009678713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002396985,0.0001682583,0.00003414693,0.00009451674,0.00008022293,0.0001518492,0.0002309981,0.0001581471,0.000004600011],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002690767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004199413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8912607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8493059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985609,0.0000357066,0.0002052556,0.0005342721,0.0003222891,0.0003415507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994438,0.0001047976,0.00004889037,0.0001970998,0.000002338275,0.0002031075],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009293503,0.0007060144,0.8732479,0.000014745,0.00007400129,0.008917522,0.0006159929,0.04838818,0.009101059,3.567058e-7,0.004635364,0.05428959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001387658,0.0002602491,0.8587587,0.00001881405,0.0001058157,0.00149098,0.002236429,0.1242746,0.0001151081,0.00003995611,0.01071436,0.0005972392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781097,0.0001623801,0.02083495,0.00002418095,0.0002382638,0.0003290313,0.0002382522,0.00002358426,0.00003966449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863074,0.000102259,0.01181803,0.00007793063,0.00003468732,0.00004740302,0.00001682218,0.00001676266,0.001578669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07588643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999454,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00441514395856148,"score_gpt":0.1717119995999331,"score_spread":0.1672968556413716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}