{"id":"W3134267451","doi":"10.3897/aca.4.e65156","title":"There's always a better way: The application of eDNA to effectively assess biodiversity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ARPHA Conference Abstracts","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem; Environmental DNA; Population; Abundance (ecology); Trophic level; Psychological resilience; Scale (ratio); Ecology; Environmental change; Resilience (materials science); Geography; Environmental science; Biology; Climate change; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002072784,0.000155321,0.0001670189,0.00001730151,0.0002393866,0.00003035307,0.0003958138,0.00006306028,0.0006988133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005365943,0.0001251978,0.00006738784,0.000186636,0.0003288307,0.0001829877,0.0006232578,0.0001375609,0.002541267],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001182413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007679128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008016786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002470748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987756,0.00006872135,0.0001647792,0.0003876489,0.0003622671,0.0002409545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992383,0.0001482949,0.0001190112,0.000383844,0.00002288753,0.00008764536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002533884,0.0002454254,0.8260006,0.00001530755,0.00007032965,0.00002462868,0.001352044,0.000350311,0.1380456,0.0001107328,0.006775449,0.0269843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000156672,0.00004236819,0.8986785,0.000008432142,0.00002854137,0.000002919185,0.0005083094,0.00001284464,0.09291609,0.0001730061,0.007334588,0.0001376796],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860528,0.00001990127,0.0005937,0.001988346,0.00006688036,0.0003178438,0.00005058245,0.00002382434,0.01088612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974391,0.00002787604,0.001480548,0.0008915694,0.00001305494,0.00001639718,0.0000123681,0.000004229297,0.0001148827],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07267798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982353,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02507878051001865,"score_gpt":0.2309799900300382,"score_spread":0.2059012095200196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}