{"id":"W3134355442","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2399","title":"Problematizing Peer Review: Academic Librarians’ Pedagogical Approaches to Peer Review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Information literacy; Equity (law); Peer feedback; Process (computing); Literacy; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Pedagogy; Medical education; Computer science; Political science; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05842472,0.0003939294,0.0006556679,0.002460773,0.006713605,0.01110513,0.003274867,0.0017686,0.003808541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.176328,0.0004795148,0.0005579516,0.002494386,0.007004804,0.006602754,0.007552679,0.00279724,0.000942347],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004522935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01673058,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001725117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003846264,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8089317,0.1660748,0.004661497,0.003089609,0.01530482,0.001937469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6939794,0.2354212,0.02332283,0.01375493,0.02764172,0.005879806],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001045657,0.0008906303,0.02191687,0.002234258,0.0001143228,0.000555405,0.499806,0.0007253767,0.002268159,0.0300779,0.007866963,0.4334396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000205754,0.001425085,0.03250536,0.003411778,0.0002814178,0.002380389,0.4951585,0.005512613,0.006223129,0.06441574,0.3882083,0.0002718074],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6150952,0.007565337,0.1642425,0.03740311,0.0009543169,0.004476675,0.0000566167,0.0008378809,0.1693683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9340164,0.002328918,0.05097156,0.002482078,0.0002607977,0.001051628,0.00002643287,0.00008640166,0.008775752],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9415753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3089832,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4968008575047343,"score_gpt":0.4081667586997699,"score_spread":0.08863409880496442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}