{"id":"W3134432750","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117920","title":"Concavity as a diagnostic feature of visual scenes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NeuroImage","topic":"Visual perception and processing mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Eye Institute; National Research Foundation of Korea; Yonsei University","keywords":"Artificial intelligence; Convexity; Computer vision; Regular polygon; Feature (linguistics); Computer science; Object (grammar); Illusory contours; Pattern recognition (psychology); Mathematics; Psychology; Perception; Geometry; Neuroscience; Optical illusion","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002247393,0.0003098501,0.0001900507,0.0005054515,0.0002990467,0.0006481354,0.0003610472,0.000283615,0.001792909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001823974,0.000291434,0.0001956581,0.0002083053,0.0008737901,0.0006759497,0.0008921552,0.0005518179,0.0001172591],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003145303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002282641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001611431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003092177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997312,0.00005880872,0.00001494899,0.00006328448,0.00009580381,0.0000359376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990727,0.000299761,0.0003624712,0.0001102381,0.00007228417,0.00008263863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002264242,0.0001442997,0.07106625,0.0004484557,0.00007633241,0.0007569906,0.002770518,0.001178502,0.8560051,0.005867715,0.0006370732,0.05878445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000429493,0.0009950026,0.888615,0.00009921593,0.0001060558,0.00384773,0.00168568,0.01000086,0.08471658,0.005933915,0.003881115,0.00007596457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915026,0.0001665688,0.004382257,0.00007321248,0.000005716612,0.00003498471,0.0000606631,0.00004298443,0.003731051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995908,0.0001046119,0.003444815,0.00003734583,0.000006143968,0.00001367038,0.0001050733,0.00001681435,0.0003635109],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001792909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005997896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04409458393555391,"score_gpt":0.3457102469651483,"score_spread":0.3016156630295944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}