{"id":"W3135287016","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.02.022","title":"Online educational materials for appendectomy patients have good quality but poor readability","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Surgery","topic":"Health Literacy and Information Accessibility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia Hospital; St. Paul's Hospital; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Readability; Index (typography); Quality (philosophy); Grade level; Reading (process); Medicine; Reading level; Patient education; Medical education; Medical physics; Computer science; Family medicine; Psychology; World Wide Web; Mathematics education","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001089475,0.0002586996,0.0003904572,0.001513254,0.0004461922,0.001693767,0.0002454397,0.0006659679,0.01850785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02474107,0.0001718792,0.0007391322,0.001422742,0.0002685317,0.001903835,0.0009046592,0.0006305423,0.002614848],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003475639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000559906,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001954452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00293893,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988652,0.0002766667,0.0002434955,0.00007980714,0.0003812391,0.0001535551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9744017,0.01232869,0.008499656,0.0005986994,0.002874653,0.001296567],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005047795,0.001083687,0.8610876,0.000637828,0.0001775409,0.0005576019,0.001701001,0.0001226551,0.001458023,0.0002055486,0.005162597,0.1273011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004334266,0.0005575605,0.9907736,0.0002303698,0.0001203475,0.0008809621,0.00196853,0.0002336937,0.0008566575,0.0004634169,0.003847877,0.00002373854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786494,0.002085273,0.0004992651,0.001714102,0.0001168204,0.00007032193,0.00135352,0.00008397528,0.0154274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929853,0.000876234,0.0007269346,0.0008100278,0.0001017544,0.00003238455,0.0007438118,0.00003394267,0.003689446],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01850785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06191486,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1149791306779733,"score_gpt":0.4762685182926291,"score_spread":0.3612893876146558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}