{"id":"W3135392674","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0234587","title":"Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":175,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada; Université Laval; Centre de Géomatique du Québec; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","keywords":"Taxon; Data science; Scope (computer science); Ecology; Distribution (mathematics); Citizen science; Geography; Species distribution; Habitat; Biology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04612755,0.001142903,0.003940783,0.02811184,0.0007471132,0.006739149,0.002611815,0.002793857,0.003640604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.214571,0.00145717,0.004703249,0.02821505,0.002401706,0.008156708,0.002577071,0.002150341,0.0008204264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003903624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01301005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006610963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01086962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9675052,0.0126922,0.01020078,0.003309831,0.005751847,0.0005401484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5162588,0.4192601,0.02543033,0.005158989,0.03263526,0.001256623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001943089,0.00005524907,0.008615167,0.575368,0.004525229,0.0002355116,0.002577742,0.001122838,0.0006091019,0.006924085,0.01045901,0.3893138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005682966,0.0002704199,0.02202502,0.6748344,0.01163392,0.0007673703,0.004900098,0.0008405655,0.0007451409,0.006655124,0.2771145,0.0001566053],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002516463,0.9908296,0.001428817,0.002720913,0.000343024,0.00006228752,0.0009080438,0.0000234758,0.001167346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02234986,0.9720159,0.002793209,0.001433703,0.0003330991,0.000179399,0.0007173725,0.00004767574,0.0001298096],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9718882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2439487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.518806111975929,"score_gpt":0.3812033281655163,"score_spread":0.1376027838104127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}