{"id":"W3135439247","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2020-0014","title":"Everybody to Count for One? Inclusion and Exclusion in Welfare-Consequentialist Public Policy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Welfare; Inclusion (mineral); Ideal (ethics); Advice (programming); Inclusion–exclusion principle; Law and economics; Public policy; Public good; Political science; Public economics; Economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Law; Social science; Politics; Microeconomics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04140244,0.0005152046,0.001374052,0.00318691,0.008780361,0.008519713,0.00232996,0.007147008,0.004818982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03250353,0.0005781716,0.001374682,0.001902119,0.03987942,0.01439242,0.007101016,0.01086347,0.0004141177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01384991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007931891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004651263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004308725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9583271,0.03037545,0.0007459196,0.002529093,0.0050915,0.002931008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9609541,0.02935425,0.002664633,0.002113464,0.003672409,0.001241038],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004647116,0.00001260393,0.00005586241,0.000006206738,0.000002940704,0.000007669271,0.0004210352,0.0002826037,0.00001044272,0.99844,0.0002789841,0.0004770611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006239872,0.000004464699,0.00006551393,0.00002587172,0.000004821138,0.000003937308,0.0002791615,0.001440172,0.0000502722,0.9953063,0.002808879,0.00000420952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1057957,0.001377553,0.1838109,0.226044,0.0006505793,0.000194829,0.0001018942,0.00008539188,0.4819391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978107,0.0003008417,0.00933869,0.004587741,0.0003569729,0.0002483778,0.00001752592,0.00003283329,0.007009935],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04140244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2189597,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09759844553922542,"score_gpt":0.356120926388872,"score_spread":0.2585224808496466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}