{"id":"W3135543589","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2021.107577","title":"Optimal firefighting to prevent domino effects: Methodologies based on dynamic influence diagram and mathematical programming","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","topic":"Risk and Safety Analysis","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Firefighting; Influence diagram; Domino effect; Process (computing); Dynamic programming; Computer science; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Decision tree; Algorithm; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008492265,0.0003479043,0.0009572541,0.0002188185,0.0002085699,0.0002701008,0.0004785935,0.0001733765,0.00001517151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02705641,0.0002592988,0.0003167878,0.001210102,0.00005935635,0.0001773866,0.0002103477,0.0003032628,0.00006911465],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003403024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008406839,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001645841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004325507,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951614,0.0008715478,0.001260376,0.001044272,0.001150357,0.0005120817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985931,0.01199768,0.0001820363,0.001279389,0.0003201704,0.0002896594],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005768135,0.0000892191,0.0009193123,0.000695041,0.00003816723,0.00004022583,0.0003563009,0.9334337,0.0007826894,0.0006501168,0.000005983288,0.06293161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003424231,0.0001656642,0.02430229,0.0009242605,0.00009651583,0.000030701,0.0004798613,0.969997,0.001672266,0.0004479522,0.001092714,0.0004483418],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4291339,0.0001759977,0.5689672,0.000658803,0.0001663394,0.0005541256,0.00001091693,0.0002368518,0.00009591028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7746399,0.00001342421,0.2251156,0.00002792155,0.00002420237,0.00009975201,0.000003377171,0.00001959407,0.00005622035],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.345506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999859,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02010170639875965,"score_gpt":0.3243541891126989,"score_spread":0.3042524827139393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}