{"id":"W3135733432","doi":"10.1016/j.jobab.2021.02.008","title":"Experimental evaluation of rice husk ash for applications in geopolymer mortars","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Bioresources and Bioproducts","topic":"Concrete and Cement Materials Research","field":"Engineering","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Volkswagen Foundation","keywords":"Husk; Metakaolin; Materials science; Geopolymer; Mortar; Pozzolan; Crystallinity; Amorphous solid; Compressive strength; Silica fume; Composite material; Flexural strength; Fly ash; Cement; Chemistry; Portland cement; Botany; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004447053,0.0000546802,0.0001287123,0.00008797633,0.00002033868,0.00002100607,0.00005384297,0.00002696,0.00004549855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002447436,0.00004550112,0.00003170535,0.0001356003,0.00002265145,0.00005501882,0.00001733618,0.00003953861,3.384727e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000198936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002928114,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001018372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002006643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993418,0.00002068418,0.0002431835,0.00007605536,0.0002261331,0.00009209962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996302,0.00001713792,0.00006087951,0.00007873883,0.0001805135,0.0000325002],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001727899,0.00003128191,0.0005867599,0.00008321854,0.00002947643,8.819181e-7,0.0002869232,0.0001571593,0.9958611,0.0000207691,0.0001258475,0.00279928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005195488,0.00006592052,0.004861129,0.00002543502,0.0000310857,0.000009327505,0.0009715609,0.0008545649,0.9901046,0.00004845353,0.002453333,0.00005506724],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890355,0.01052675,0.0000286592,0.00006975381,0.00006335446,0.0001491599,0.000008412726,0.000002938905,0.000115488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994618,0.0001324472,0.0001995679,0.000005388964,0.0001542352,0.00001119539,0.00000512704,0.000006320417,0.00002396927],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01042627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1855482,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0283895089874108,"score_gpt":0.2953513631761824,"score_spread":0.2669618541887717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}