{"id":"W3138039748","doi":"","title":"Environmental risk assessment of fluoxetine A case study with a human pharmaceutical","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"History and advancements in chemistry","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Trent University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Fluoxetine; Computer science; Environmental risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk assessment; Business; Medicine; Internal medicine; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000694329,0.0004586918,0.0003621594,0.001170349,0.001520243,0.0008761817,0.0007629956,0.002140114,0.004277585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001141254,0.000259566,0.0007997474,0.0009041319,0.0006170077,0.0004122079,0.000710693,0.000387273,0.0003796036],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001173527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009911602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03497515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04492407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993298,0.0002943901,0.00002557012,0.00007068057,0.0001923305,0.00008728328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993118,0.0004214369,0.00006394424,0.00003914368,0.0001143571,0.00004927825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003295292,0.00311413,0.2866981,0.0009185305,0.0006409558,0.3215948,0.009602722,0.1697877,0.02742317,0.009514841,0.0107377,0.1566721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005350566,0.008485504,0.3018318,0.0005117601,0.001509186,0.1579394,0.06367889,0.2932318,0.07027787,0.01511042,0.08640751,0.0004808412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9774264,0.0005434883,0.006477568,0.001008224,0.00001871716,0.0001517137,0.0005465044,0.00005146098,0.01377601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866,0.000636286,0.004896587,0.0001072268,0.00001569663,0.00002794729,0.0001855159,0.00001532744,0.007515429],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03497515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06954312,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02015576268958196,"score_gpt":0.2914176478173344,"score_spread":0.2712618851277524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}