{"id":"W3139155286","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpaa183","title":"The Australian tobacco plain packaging legislation: a case study on intellectual property enforcement and policy intervention to promote public health","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Intellectual property; Business; Legislation; Public health; Intervention (counseling); Tobacco control; State (computer science); Tobacco industry; Standardization; Sovereignty; Packaging and labeling; Environmental health; Political science; Medicine; Law; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01528021,0.0006601224,0.0006977717,0.00259498,0.02747783,0.007634045,0.003211129,0.01493006,0.005082537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02101837,0.000740547,0.0009275108,0.003825968,0.01216298,0.004504205,0.009367158,0.01167321,0.0004305922],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01737569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02216845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1101497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1488244,"domain_scores_codex":[0.982519,0.009711833,0.0004037931,0.0008289165,0.003629995,0.002906373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868095,0.008846706,0.001170903,0.0007181728,0.001057914,0.001396738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009383898,0.001176604,0.01354797,0.0007759851,0.00004943297,0.0589803,0.371214,0.0008926305,0.00157568,0.4794061,0.01990849,0.05237892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001016912,0.0008243737,0.05920677,0.002823868,0.0001549405,0.02115259,0.321449,0.005697275,0.002855325,0.07148317,0.5140432,0.0002077864],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6199773,0.007292051,0.004627893,0.08984892,0.000427387,0.0006748308,0.00008002461,0.00006303556,0.2770085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9323035,0.005055984,0.003024922,0.01705584,0.0002122543,0.0002977879,0.00003422297,0.00003646933,0.04197893],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1101497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.219017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1339367764642654,"score_gpt":0.3701214223184702,"score_spread":0.2361846458542048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}