{"id":"W3139167773","doi":"10.1177/1356389020978501","title":"Developing an ethical rationale for collaborative approaches to evaluation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Dialogic; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Context (archaeology); Politics; Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Pedagogy; Social science; Engineering; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03849379,0.0001431319,0.0002165629,0.0002332178,0.0004152385,0.0004562963,0.0002615291,0.0001704375,0.00272236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01617557,0.0001251916,0.00006461582,0.001503304,0.00002977146,0.0007276449,0.00005570279,0.0001458013,0.0003018478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004800522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005564382,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001945704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003546394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908017,0.002177653,0.0007442344,0.0007034868,0.005360042,0.0002128994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890243,0.001288024,0.0002442393,0.0004926798,0.00882321,0.0001275862],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001423494,0.0001649799,0.001168629,0.00001209875,0.00004720096,3.437573e-7,0.01332786,0.1203632,0.00223159,0.2259679,0.01023421,0.6263397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001344403,0.0001508736,0.01960642,0.00001702784,0.00006712306,0.000002247003,0.007813538,0.7781933,0.006716229,0.1603503,0.02549206,0.0002464945],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3929864,0.0002133673,0.4978581,0.08848976,0.001364286,0.005461904,0.00005178641,0.00006025925,0.01351405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8962305,0.000004298309,0.09628579,0.003663885,0.0003477308,0.00198043,0.0007365388,0.00001526129,0.000735526],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6578301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8319796326770158,"score_gpt":0.5935660075730588,"score_spread":0.238413625103957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}