{"id":"W3140092967","doi":"10.21037/tau-20-1399","title":"Stone removing efficiency and safety comparison between single use ureteroscope and reusable ureteroscope: a systematic review and meta-analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Translational Andrology and Urology","topic":"Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"West China Hospital, Sichuan University; Health Department of Sichuan Province; Sichuan University; Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province","keywords":"URETEROSCOPE; Medicine; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Single use; Safety profile; Medical physics; MEDLINE; Adverse effect; Surgery; Internal medicine; Engineering; Process engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0171632,0.00307213,0.02365777,0.008753991,0.0007871628,0.003976181,0.002499388,0.002771949,0.003551949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03634062,0.001705146,0.05109254,0.007631621,0.0009320746,0.002433495,0.00182654,0.00200963,0.0002328837],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003549725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00544525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004593787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009297347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.98666,0.005937778,0.004097217,0.001146629,0.001788172,0.0003702119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789064,0.01512158,0.003552861,0.0005525629,0.001604812,0.0002618412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00272365,0.00005577262,0.002440167,0.4593188,0.523425,0.0001203098,0.0001108211,0.0005072906,0.000202226,0.0001207706,0.000366291,0.01060898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007811688,0.0003110085,0.002107268,0.02065449,0.9747404,0.00009108117,0.00005368318,0.0002184428,0.0001165805,0.0001325355,0.0007688569,0.00002451065],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.007388764,0.9903893,0.0006717684,0.0001712006,0.0001595739,0.0007137932,0.0002865715,0.00002405342,0.0001949594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1884838,0.800891,0.004177855,0.0008448442,0.0003878554,0.003936373,0.0007956775,0.00003247413,0.0004501809],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9763422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09076875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1234056936252482,"score_gpt":0.3700593034684062,"score_spread":0.2466536098431579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}