{"id":"W3140427162","doi":"10.1109/cefc-06.2006.1632827","title":"An Iterative Absorbing Boundary Condition using Varying Element Orders","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computation; Boundary value problem; Finite element method; Iterative method; Computer science; Boundary (topology); Electromagnetic field; Domain (mathematical analysis); Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Applied mathematics; Computational electromagnetics; Field (mathematics); Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009882913,0.0006005681,0.0006565317,0.0006667868,0.0007583585,0.001199695,0.001497899,0.00143362,0.004384139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004743142,0.0004800549,0.0005657349,0.0005218158,0.0009016726,0.001316703,0.001407446,0.001409721,0.001397701],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006326974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001266067,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002095976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002063271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999025,0.0002252699,0.00004839287,0.00008896228,0.0005337177,0.0000786304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976758,0.00108185,0.0001133237,0.0004215655,0.0006244352,0.00008299293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004301904,0.0002001699,0.001207311,0.0001848529,0.00004289064,0.0003403839,0.0006653877,0.5060872,0.1402149,0.1868493,0.004861103,0.1589162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000186899,0.00003130829,0.00007311539,0.00001549559,0.000007246339,0.00006653061,0.00001628981,0.9747805,0.01593868,0.005852026,0.003185103,0.00001511837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01128057,0.0000405048,0.9808846,0.00007873055,0.00004492345,0.00005105999,0.00003073864,0.0003846585,0.00720424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1948138,0.00009039688,0.798329,0.0001326765,0.00003511496,0.0001970042,0.0001171855,0.0002517844,0.006033069],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004384139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01466638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006992476214632917,"score_gpt":0.2613849797663826,"score_spread":0.2543925035517497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}