{"id":"W3140905632","doi":"10.1016/j.outlook.2021.02.006","title":"Meta approaches in knowledge synthesis in nursing: A bibliometric analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing Outlook","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute for Health and Care Research; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Nursing Research; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Meta-analysis; Nursing literature; Nursing research; China; MEDLINE; Nursing; Medicine; Library science; Alternative medicine; Political science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003653306,0.0001628793,0.0006477862,0.06074977,0.0003842125,0.00004414972,0.0002871935,0.0002222278,0.0009528784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002200332,0.0001451982,0.0001744911,0.2242458,0.0001537467,0.0002560083,0.00003199447,0.0007502862,0.0002510127],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001241694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002340578,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007333486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002573093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951861,0.001862277,0.0007239741,0.0005781216,0.0004819182,0.00116759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967605,0.002065918,0.0001303818,0.0004671518,0.0002029328,0.0003730834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006831912,0.003063182,0.6673731,0.0004239941,0.0004124695,0.00002457493,0.05577058,0.0001817332,0.00009834483,0.001354296,0.01359333,0.2576361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003840109,0.00003062665,0.9650177,0.0008914386,0.0006761932,0.000001769022,0.01922214,0.009414565,0.0001619187,0.001403801,0.002556432,0.0002393501],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8347121,0.01131515,0.0006671987,0.01650905,0.001205505,0.0007749563,0.00001246495,0.00007503149,0.1347285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944016,0.0002535353,0.001472365,0.0001487373,0.0001756257,0.0003201347,0.00001851784,0.00001673553,0.003192691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2976447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999604,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5079876294405337,"score_gpt":0.5489864083737734,"score_spread":0.04099877893323978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}