{"id":"W3141251312","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdac064","title":"Optimal Environmental Targeting in the Amazon Rainforest","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Deforestation (computer science); Amazon rainforest; Enforcement; Greenhouse gas; Rainforest; Natural resource economics; Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation; Government (linguistics); Economics; Business; Environmental resource management; Climate change; Computer science; Political science; Carbon stock; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002936188,0.0001193493,0.0004289728,0.00004608867,0.00022496,0.000007684162,0.0004073531,0.00001239922,0.001241586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004571377,0.00009122282,0.0001417346,0.00004698287,0.0001452307,0.00009510459,0.0002720912,0.0001416199,0.0003234926],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003673206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007142142,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004314069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003777517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987059,0.00007634251,0.0008099272,0.0002096726,0.00002951757,0.0001686998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990147,0.0001733996,0.0005120997,0.0002873967,9.404161e-7,0.00001144114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005637099,0.000457189,0.6038863,0.002291686,0.0009510986,0.000006533404,0.02228556,0.04596459,0.00001838037,0.2093963,0.1063157,0.008370263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002118312,0.0004883532,0.3385433,0.0005868868,0.0001280668,0.00004834183,0.04068013,0.004295163,0.00002727315,0.01971096,0.5922604,0.001112837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5832527,0.4073996,0.00000591841,0.002912339,0.00026788,0.0005331283,0.000105996,0.000004812,0.00551754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8501098,0.1481106,0.0000562209,0.001258226,0.00005451755,0.0002102626,0.00002271452,0.00001037302,0.0001672248],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4859446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09736729057486598,"score_gpt":0.2582939633383874,"score_spread":0.1609266727635214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}