{"id":"W3141509674","doi":"10.1186/s13021-021-00171-w","title":"Wood product carbon substitution benefits: a critical review of assumptions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Carbon Balance and Management","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Government of British Columbia; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Substitution (logic); Carbon fibers; Product (mathematics); Environmental science; Greenhouse gas; Natural resource economics; Environmental economics; Waste management; Engineering; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009165187,0.002246299,0.00264751,0.007958945,0.0009100327,0.004605989,0.004378762,0.002370446,0.004940465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02215169,0.001396557,0.002845624,0.007256434,0.002599468,0.007256317,0.001631597,0.004979171,0.001791582],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006828338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005656745,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007679111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005468914,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966648,0.000991942,0.0005500519,0.0005384409,0.001102032,0.0001526757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762684,0.01861929,0.001638332,0.0003437203,0.003015595,0.0001145681],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003010878,0.00012189,0.001156734,0.1162749,0.000697814,0.0006126284,0.0008512347,0.01266554,0.001120554,0.1652973,0.042782,0.6581184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001990234,0.000233945,0.003311271,0.1775317,0.001031368,0.0008480108,0.0009429716,0.002580307,0.001444926,0.09746733,0.7144533,0.0001349213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006220744,0.9888524,0.002126626,0.002451007,0.000571433,0.00005463919,0.0002147545,0.00001592624,0.005091129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007186284,0.9888363,0.001726317,0.001049856,0.0004726753,0.00007851411,0.0001749286,0.00001488266,0.0004602119],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009165187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04954326,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03504690710551092,"score_gpt":0.3064251012624359,"score_spread":0.271378194156925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}