{"id":"W3142498888","doi":"","title":"Does urban land use decrease carbon sequestration?——A case study in Taizhou,China","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Environmental science; Evergreen; Lawn; Biomass (ecology); Tree allometry; Primary production; Vegetation (pathology); Productivity; Forestry; Agroforestry; Pruning; Canopy; Ecosystem; Agronomy; Ecology; Geography; Biomass partitioning; Carbon dioxide; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005734743,0.0001481687,0.0003032404,0.00009973132,0.00007268084,0.00004466617,0.0001928251,0.00009761652,0.0004809167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001146265,0.00007024196,0.00004446356,0.0001324214,0.00001787626,0.0003640601,0.00006794013,0.0003507499,0.00001360079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005058484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003863487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007623644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4646609,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989098,0.0001283798,0.0004491252,0.0001569812,0.0001486951,0.0002070128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992102,0.0001583331,0.0002677501,0.0001593466,0.00001246055,0.00019185],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006648662,0.0003412401,0.9843084,0.000006997844,0.00001905345,0.01319634,0.001008245,0.0003224281,0.000643034,0.000001102556,0.00005961976,0.00002706331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009956107,0.0002965296,0.9892055,0.000007604333,0.00002796577,0.007188541,0.0002080716,0.001673746,0.00002571933,0.0001309183,0.0001233489,0.0001163976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986767,0.000005637125,4.391595e-7,0.00012011,0.0008654464,0.0001842888,0.00001605259,0.000007849482,0.0001234545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996275,0.000008510697,0.00005537445,0.00005496258,0.0002179226,0.000004214361,0.000004171377,0.000008478839,0.00001882425],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4570373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00654405272818058,"score_gpt":0.2280664787806589,"score_spread":0.2215224260524783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}